Description: This assignment consists of two parts:
Part A: An online quiz Assignment 2, which includes 20 questions. Students may have 3 attempts at this quiz. The system will record the highest grade.
Part B: Answering 3 questions related to aspects of Platform Technologies.
SUBMITTHISSAMEDOCUMENTWITHYOURANSWERS
| Section | Mark | Out of Mark |
| A-QUIZ | 15 | |
| B-Q1 | 15 | |
| B-Q2 | 10 | |
| B-Q3 | 10 | |
| Total | 50 |
Assignment 2 – Questions
A-QUIZ. (15 marks) Attempt the Assignment 2 quiz after Week 9, and paste the Moodle summary of your result below.
**** Paste your result here ****
B-Q1. 15 marks (3 x 5 marks = 15 marks)) Digital Logic and Design:
S = A/BC + /ABC + AB/C + /A/B/C
T = /A/BC + A/BC + /AB/C + ABC
B-Q2 10 marks (2 x 5 marks = 10 marks) Perform the following operations:
B-Q3. 10 marks (5 x 2 Marks = 10 marks)
You are required to research the topic “8086 Microprocessor” and answer the following questions:
Your report should be limited to 4 to 5 pages and should be written in your own words. Provide graphical or tabular information, if necessary.
Marking Criteria:
Marks are allocated as indicated on each question, taking the following aspects into account:
| Aspects | Description |
| Analysis (if appropriate) | Investigation, comparison, discussion |
| Explanation/justification | Description/answer to the question |
| Presentation | Inadequate structure, careless presentation, poor writing |
| Reference style (IEEE) | Proper referencing if required |
Plagiarism | Copy from another student, copy from internet source/textbook, copy from other sources without proper acknowledgement |
| Grade Mark | HD 80%+ | DI 70%-79% | CR 60%-69% | P 50%-59% | Fail < 50% |
| Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| Analysis | Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments | Consistency logical and convincing | Mostly consistent and convincing | Adequate cohesion and conviction | Argument is confused and disjointed |
| Explanation/ justification | All elements are present and well integrated. | Components present with good cohesion | Components present and mostly well integrated | Most components present | Lacks structure. |
| Reference style | Clear styles with excellent source of references. | Clear referencing/ style | Generally good referencing/style | Unclear referencing/style | Lacks consistency with many errors |
| Presentation | Proper writing. Professionally presented | Properly written, with some minor deficiencies | Mostly good, but some structure or presentation problems | Acceptable presentation | Poor structure, careless presentation |
Marking Rubricfor Assignment 2 Questions–Marks as shown
The End