Peer Review Rebuttal & Defense to my Case analysis is attached
After receiving your peer review feedback, you will then have the opportunity to respond and/or constructively defend your case analysis in a rebuttal. See the Case Analysis Response/Defense Guidelines linked below for response/defense requirements. As with the peer review, you will first submit your response/defense document directly to the instructor for grading, and then return to the corresponding Discussion forum and provide the response/defense file to your peer reviewer as an attachment in a reply to their peer review posting.
Response/Defense Guide, (DOCX) Download Response/Defense Guide, (DOCX)
Once the peer review is complete, you have the task of responding and/or defending the assessment of your case analysis.
Successful responses reflect high levels of the following:
Good use of peer review feedback.
Response either maintains/defend the original position and provides further information/explanation or continues with concept(s) given in the review and re-approaches the analysis.
You stayed within the word limitation of roughly 200 words.
A bulleted list is used to address your original position.

You will provide a rebuttal to the peer review you received on your Case Analysis (CA3) and post by attaching a document of your review to this discussion activity. Before posting, check the document for correct grammar, spelling, and formatting.
Thoroughly review the peer review and evaluate the given actions and recommendation before posting.
Follow the Peer Review Defense guidelines and the Peer Review Defense rubric on the Information about Case Analyses, Peer Reviews & Defense page, and the grading criteria when conducting your rebuttal.
Peer Review Rebuttal & Defense rubric is associated with this assignment for review and grading.

From the summary, there seems to be a fatal helicopter crash in the California mountains. When looking further into the case online, the crash occurred during the initial climb at around 6,000 feet. I would have liked to have more details in the summary, but you also mention that there are multiple critical factors to the case. Other than minute details, the summary is clear and concise! When getting into the problem section, there were three main factors for the helicopter crash. There was a quote used by the NTSB, but it would have been nice to summarize that information in your own words. Regardless, the problem portion presents the problem and what ultimately caused the accident.
I agree with your significant statement regarding negligence, following proper procedure, and underestimating. Your summarizing used in the significance statement was great. You made a couple of huge points regarding negligence and following procedure. I really enjoy your development of the alternative action. Your review and understanding of the case are remarkably interesting and easy to follow. I agree with your assessment on the development of the alternative action. Your recommendation was spot on, it is important for the FAA to follow a stricter approach to companies and their fleets. Trust but verify is the best way to avoid an accident such as flight N612AZ.
When reading your case analysis, I wish there were just a little more details so that I could have a full understanding of the accident report. I was able to find the report online and gather the details. The only other thing was not completely answering the questions given in the case analysis assignment. However, you narrowed down the information given, which was easy to read and understand. There was consistency with regards to the writing style and information provided throughout the case analysis. I enjoyed reading your case analysis and opinions on alternative actions and recommendations. Great case analysis!

From the summary, there seems to be a fatal helicopter crash in the California mountains. When looking further into the case online, the crash occurred during the initial climb at around 6,000 feet. I would have liked to have more details in the summary, but you also mention that there are multiple critical factors to the case. Other than minute details, the summary is clear and concise! When getting into the problem section, there were three main factors for the helicopter crash. There was a quote used by the NTSB, but it would have been nice to summarize that information in your own words. Regardless, the problem portion presents the problem and what ultimately caused the accident.
I agree with your significant statement regarding negligence, following proper procedure, and underestimating. Your summarizing used in the significance statement was great. You made a couple of huge points regarding negligence and following procedure. I really enjoy your development of the alternative action. Your review and understanding of the case are remarkably interesting and easy to follow. I agree with your assessment on the development of the alternative action. Your recommendation was spot on, it is important for the FAA to follow a stricter approach to companies and their fleets. Trust but verify is the best way to avoid an accident such as flight N612AZ.