support@w4writers.com +44 7743 307695
May 26, 2023

UMUC Differences of Online Banner Advertising & Outdoor Display Advertising Discussion
TOPIC 1:Online banner advertising and outdoor display advertising both use images to try to increase sales. In planning, b …

UMUC Differences of Online Banner Advertising & Outdoor Display Advertising Discussion
TOPIC 1:Online banner advertising and outdoor display advertising both use images to try to increase sales. In planning, both need to consider placement so as to be seen by their most likely audience. What are the key differences?Use at least one (1) reference and interact with at least one (1) classmate.TOPIC 2:Explain why intrusive ads may be a good choice for an advertiser. Discuss a situation where a user may see an intrusive ad and have a bad experience with it. Do you think that could change a user’s opinion of that brand? If so, how?Use a reference to explain your response.

ACCT 201 Government College University Business and Accounting Question

ACCT 201 Government College University Business and Accounting Question

3 pages

Webinar
I chose a webinar called Using Mindfulness with Children of All Abilities in the If someone asked you why you chose this o …

Webinar
I chose a webinar called Using Mindfulness with Children of All Abilities in the If someone asked you why you chose this option, what would you tell …

PJM310 Colorado Mod 3 Crosby Manufacturing Portfolio Milestone Project
Module 3: Portfolio Milestone Points 30 Submitting a …

PJM310 Colorado Mod 3 Crosby Manufacturing Portfolio Milestone Project
Module 3: Portfolio Milestone Points 30 Submitting a file upload Portfolio Milestone: (30 points)Important! Read FirstChoose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.Option #1: Case Overview Read the case Crosby Manufacturing Corporation (Page 203-206) from Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management Case Studies (Vol. Fifth edition). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.csuglobal.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1502146&site=ehost-live. (Links to an external site.) Examine the project management issues including concerns about the project, timeline, uncertainties about meeting timelines, and consequences.Let’s practice Cooperative Learning. To that end, please reach out to at least one fellow classmate and discuss the project management issues of importance in this case. You are NOT producing an assignment together but rather engaging in a sharing of research and informed opinion. Include the name(s) of the other student(s) with whom you are in cooperative discussion. (Your classmate does not need to choose the same Portfolio Project option as you. The goal here is to simply enhance your learning about project management issues through sharing and debate. You may email your fellow students to ask for participation.)Your paper must include the following: Introduction: In no more than 1 paragraph, explain the purpose or thesis of the paper, and explain how the body of the paper is arranged to support the purpose of the paper.Body: In no more than 1 page, provide a brief overview of the case and the project management issues as identified in the case.In about two pages, describe your analysis of the approach the team took, its challenges, and details about the result.Conclusion: In no more than 1 paragraph, present a recap of key points and summary of main emphasis without repeating verbatim and exclusive of new information.References: Include at least two current scholarly references (peer-reviewed articles published within the past five years) in addition to the course textbook and/or lecture material to support your overview and your findings.Format your submission to conform to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.) Option #2: Case Overview As an example of what is required, read the Crosby Manufacturing Corporation (Page 203-206) from Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management Case Studies (Vol. Fifth edition). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.csuglobal.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1502146&site=ehost-live (Links to an external site.) Let’s practice Cooperative Learning. To that end, please reach out to at least one fellow classmate and discuss the project management issues of importance in this case. You are NOT producing an assignment together but rather engaging in a sharing of research and informed opinion. Include the name(s) of the other student(s) with whom you are in cooperative discussion. (Your classmate does not need to choose the same Portfolio Project option as you. The goal here is to simply enhance your learning about project management issues through sharing and debate. You may simply email your fellow students to ask for participation).Document any concerns you have about accessing the data to develop your own case and how you will overcome them in a timely manner to meet the portfolio deadline in Module 8.Then prepare your paper. Your paper must include the following: Introduction: In no more than 1 paragraph, explain the purpose or thesis of the paper, and explain how the body of the paper is arranged to support the purpose of the paper.Body: In no more than 1 page, provide a brief overview of the case and the project management issues as identified in the case.In about two pages, describe your analysis of the approach the team took, its challenges, and details about the result.Conclusion: In no more than 1 paragraph, present a recap of key points and summary of main emphasis without repeating verbatim and exclusive of new information.References: Include at least two current scholarly references (peer reviewed articles published within the past five years) in addition to the course textbook and/or lecture material to support your overview and your findings.Format your submission to conform to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.). Rubric PJM310 Mod 3 PM PJM310 Mod 3 PM Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation This response includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation This response includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation This response includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence This response includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the project management concepts. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of project management concepts. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of project management concepts. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited EvidenceFails to demonstrate knowledge of the project management concepts. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style 5.0 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 4.0 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and well written, and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 3.0 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 2.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not well organized or well written, and/or is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style 5.0 to >4.0 pts Meets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than one significant error. 4.0 to >3.0 pts Approaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. 3.0 to >2.0 pts Below ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with four to five significant errors. 2.0 to >0 pts Limited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with more than five significant errors. 5.0 pts

SecurityWeek Essay Submittal
Open a new Microsoft® Word document, and enter your answer to one of the prompts below:Scan the articles to identify 3 pa …

SecurityWeek Essay Submittal
Open a new Microsoft® Word document, and enter your answer to one of the prompts below:Scan the articles to identify 3 patches recently made to operating systems or software applications for mobile devices. Create a list of software vendors and the number of patches applied by each over the past year.Scan the articles to identify cyberattacks related to the Internet of Things. Briefly describe the two most serious attacks you can find. What is being done to safeguard the Internet of Things from further, even more serious attacks?Scan the articles to gain insight into the use of ATM fraud devices known as “insert skimmers.” What are these devices, how widespread is there use, what can consumers do to protect against their use?Save the file on your computer with your last name in the file name. (Example: part_05_Jones.doc)Click the Browse button below to find and select your saved document, and then click Submit Assignment for Grading.

SEU International Human Resource Management Essay
For this assignment, you will apply decision-making to the process of international human resource management as you deter …

SEU International Human Resource Management Essay
For this assignment, you will apply decision-making to the process of international human resource management as you determine which of the four final applicants to hire into a global executive position.   You are a member of the management committee of a MNE that conducts business in 23 countries. While your company’s headquarters is located in the Netherlands, your regional offices are located fairly evenly throughout the four hemispheres. Primary markets have been in the European Union and North America; the strongest emerging market is the Pacific Rim. Company executives would like to develop what they see as a powerful potential market in the Middle East. Sales in all areas except the Pacific Rim have shown slow growth over the past two years. At present, your company is seeking to restructure and revitalize its worldwide marketing efforts. To accomplish this, you have determined that you need to hire a key marketing person to introduce fresh ideas and a new perspective. There is no one currently in your company who is qualified to do this, and so you have decided to look outside.  The job title is “Vice President for Global Marketing”; an annual salary of $250,000-$300,000, plus elaborate benefits, an unlimited expense account, a car, and the use of the corporate jet. The person you hire will be based at the company’s headquarters in the Netherlands and will travel frequently. A lengthy search has turned up four people with good potential. It is now up to you to decide whom to hire. Although all the applicants have expressed a sincere interest in the position, it is possible that they may change their minds once the job is offered. Therefore, you must rank them in order of preference so that if your first choice declines the position, you can go on to the second, and so on. First, read the biographies of each applicant. As you are doing this, rank each of them from 1 to 4, with 1 being your first choice, and explain your reasons for their ranking.  For your essay this week, respond to the following questions using the decisions you have made with your rankings.  The first section of your paper should be an overview of your      rankings and reasons for your decisions. Did your decision include any culturally based biases you may      have—for example, feelings, personality traits, or politics in your      rankings? Did you make any observations that you feel would have been      fully acceptable in your own culture, but were not accepted in other      cultures? If so, explain. What implications do you believe any of the applicant’s      cultural differences would have in business dealings? In what countries or      cultures?  What expatriate adjustments for the candidate need to be      considered? How will the company handle these?  Explain the decision-making process you used to make your      decisions.  Park L. Park L. is currently senior vice president for marketing at a major South Korean high-technology firm. You have been told by the head of your Seoul office that his reputation as an expert in international marketing is outstanding. The market share of his company’s products has consistently increased since he joined the company just over 15 years ago. His company’s market share is now well ahead of that of competing producers in the Pacific Rim. Park graduated from the University of Seoul and has worked his way up through the ranks. He does not have a graduate degree. In addition to his native tongue, Park is able to carry on a reasonably fluent conversation in English and has minimal working knowledge of German and French. Saya K. Saya K. is a woman living in Malaysia. She began her teaching career while finishing her DBA (Doctorate in Business Administration) at the Harvard Business School and published her first book on international marketing ten months after graduation. Her doctoral dissertation was based on the international marketing of pharmaceuticals, but she has also done research and published on other areas of international marketing. Two months after the publication of her book, Saya went to work in the international marketing department of a Fortune 500 company, where she stayed for the next ten years. She returned to teaching when Maura University offered her a full professorship with tenure, and she has been there since that time. In addition, she has an active consulting practice throughout Southeast Asia. In addition to fluency in Malay, English, and Japanese, Saya speaks and writes German and Spanish and can converse in Mandarin. Peter V. Peter had worked in a key position in the international marketing division of a US Fortune 100 company until the company pulled out of his country South Africa eight months ago. Peter has a long list of accomplishments and is widely recognized as outstanding in his field.  Peter has a Ph.D. in computer science from a leading South African university and an MBA from Purdue’s Krannert School of Business. Peter speaks and reads English, Dutch, Afrikaans, and Swahili and can converse in German. Joe P. Joe is currently job hunting. His former job as head of marketing for a single-product, high-technology firm—highly specialized workstations for sophisticated artificial intelligence applications—ended when the company was bought out by Texas Instruments.  Joe has both his undergraduate and MBA degrees from Stanford University. In addition, he was a Rhodes Scholar and won a Fulbright scholarship, which he used to support himself while he undertook a two-year research project on the marketing of high-technology equipment to Third World countries. In addition to his native English, Joe has a minimal command of French—which he admits he hasn’t used since his college days.

Order this Assignment now

Total: GBP120

fables template