Jul 01, 2025

Case Study Scoring Rubric

Rubric code	Rubric Criteria & Weightage	Excellent (4)	Good (3)	Satisfactory (2)	Needs Improvement (1)
R1	Introduction [3]	Excellent explanation and overview of the case study topic	Good explanation and overview of the case study topic	Adequate explanation and overview of the case study topic	Inadequate explanation and overview of the case study topic
R2	Analysis [5]	Comprehensive and thorough analysis that covers all aspects of the topic	Clear analysis that covers all aspects of the topic	Basic analysis that covers all aspects of the topic	Incomplete and wrong understanding in analysis of all aspects of the topic.
R3	Identify issues [3] • Students will identify real or potential problems	Thoroughly and accurately identifies and summarizes main issues, critically addressing their relationships with each other	Clearly identifies and summarizes the main issues but hardly addresses their relationship to each other.	Adequately identifies main issues but does not summarize or explain them clearly or sufficiently	Poorly identifies, summarizes, or explains the main issue or question. Represents the issues inaccurately or inappropriately.
R4	Identify solutions [4] • Students will develop, evaluate, and present possible solutions where appropriate	Thoroughly defines steps in problem-solving. • Achieves, clear conclusions from the data • Employs creativity in the search for a solution. • Recognizes and values alternative problem-solving methods, when appropriate.	Clearly defines steps in problem-solving. • Focuses on difficult problems with persistence. • Understand the real-world relevance of the problem. • Provides a logical interpretation of the data	Adequately defines steps in problem-solving. • Can identify problem types. • Relies on standardized solution methods, rather than guesswork or intuition. • Understands the level of complexity of a problem.	Inadequate description of problem-solving steps. • Does not understand problems in the given context. • Inability to choose appropriate solutions
R5	Knowledge extraction [5] (Suggestion, comparison, information accuracy, conclusion)	Proficient (outstanding) explanation	Clear explanation	Adequate explanation	Poor explanation
R6	Report writing element [3] • Structured and organized • Clarity of language • Consistency of content Use of figurative language for all materials	Comprehensively reflects the following elements: • The text is distinctly understandable. • The format is both appropriate and attractive. • No misspelled words (or make only a rare misspelling in a long or complex text).	Clearly reflects the following elements: • The text is clearly understandable. • The format is appropriate. • Few misspellings in proportion to the length and complexity of the text	Adequately reflects the following elements: • The text is generally understandable. • The format is acceptable. • Several misspellings in proportion to the length and complexity of the text.	Poorly reflects the following elements: • The text is generally poorly written. • The format is unacceptable. • Frequent misspellings are distracting, regardless of the length or complexity of the text.
R7	Anti-plagiarism	Refer to the note for the next course of action.

MQF2 Rubric Criteria	Weight	Marks
LOTS Introduction	3
COGNITIVE Analysis	5
COGNITIVE Identify issues	4
HOTS Identify solutions	5
PRACTICAL SKILLS Knowledge extraction	5
PRACTICAL SKILLS Report writing	3
Total marks (/100)		(20%)

*Note: Case Study/Assignment Submission Guidelines for ETHICS requirements.

You are required to use an anti-plagiarism tool advised by your lecturer to check your assignment for plagiarism and whether it complies with ethical standards regarding originality and citation. The tool will also check the similarity of your work to original sources. Your lecturer will confirm whether they require a hard copy of your assignment and/or a soft copy (For example: via Turnitin/online portal). Below is the Anti-Plagiarism Criterion Rubric guide, which will be used to assess your anti-plagiarism compliance.

SIMILARITY INDEX/AI DETECTION (%)	Result	Action
<25%	Proceed to submit	No further revisions are needed; unless otherwise instructed by the lecturer.
>=25%	Re-submit	Revise the assignment to reduce similarity and ensure proper citation, then submit again.

CSC408 MIS Case Study Assignment Report: Analysis of Issues and Solutions in Information Systems

Case Study Scoring Rubric

Order this Assignment now

Total: GBP130

Our Office

Services

Quick Links

Quick Links