Overview
In this assessment, you will submit and present a conference style poster on an experimental design that could be used to answer your research question. Peer assessments will also be undertaken. This assessment is designed to provide you with a scientific conference-style experience, and you will present your poster in both written and oral form.
Assessment structure
For your abstract and blog, you will have already developed a research question and summarised the aims, background, hypotheses and experimental design for this question. You will need to expand on the experimental design, as a detailed methodology of how the experiments will be done is required. This information will be used to form the basis of your Poster, which you will submit and also present orally at ‘the conference’. In addition, you will peer assess other students poster/oral to test your ability to discriminate the quality of other students work.
Using Microsoft Powerpoint or similar software, create a visually appealing and informative poster (dimensions 0.9m x 1.2m). Use the following links to view some examples of scientific conference posters:
Peer Review
Some of your grade for Assessment 4 will come from your expertise in marking your peers. You will complete 3 reviews, and be awarded marks depending on how closely your assessment of your peers matches the grade given by your instructor. Only two of your reviews (the two that most closely match the instructor`s mark) will count towards your grade.
As you watch the Poster Presentations, take notes on their content and delivery. It may help to use the Poster Rubric that your instructor will be using.
Please note, your assessment of your peers` work will not affect their grade. This part of the assessment is designed so that you can practice being the `expert assessor`, and more fully integrate what makes a good conference poster and presentation. It is good to be aware that while a student`s assessment of their peers is often quite accurate when grading work of a high standard, it is often less accurate when assessing work of a lower standard. To avoid this, be as honest as you can. Your assessment of your peers is not seen by them, and is does not affect their grade - only yours!
This Medical Sciences Assignment Help has been solved by our Medical Sciences Experts at Unilearno. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
SHN6023 : Mental Health, Resilience and Recovery Across the Life-course – Case Study Assignment
Read MoreBUS6009 : International Business Management – Written Case Report
Read MoreBUS6018 : PROJECT MANAGEMENT – PROJECT PLAN
Read MoreHCM4003 : Communication and Interprofessional Collaboration – Podcast
Read MoreQHO335 : Business Project – Critical evaluation of an organisation’s response during the cost-of-living crisis in the UK
Read MorePRM7006 : Management of Traditional Projects – PID Assignment
Read MoreBMA5108-20H : International Business – Strategic Evaluation
Read MoreCA5055 : Airline Revenue and Pricing Management – REPORT
Read MoreCA5056 Aviation Psychology and Human Factors Assignment brief
Read MoreHow can i assist with youGBEN5006 : Intrapreneurial Development – Portfolio
Read More